From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17691 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2009 00:08:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 17683 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Sep 2009 00:08:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 00:08:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838882BABDA; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 20:08:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id WnJiWNCtmnGc; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 20:08:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA742BABC4; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 20:08:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 230E4F589B; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 17:08:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 00:08:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] move dwarf2_free_objfile to dwarf2_per_objfile_cleanup Message-ID: <20090905000805.GA30677@adacore.com> References: <20090904235009.5FA8D843B9@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090904235009.5FA8D843B9@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00110.txt.bz2 > Joel, did you want to have some kind of freeze before the branch? > [Maybe you said so and I missed it.] I generally don't like the idea of an absolute freeze outside of a branch. That was until I saw the performance improvement patch from Jan ;-). For now, my plan is to NOT have any formal freeze, but to ask to hold the patch until after the branch if it makes us a little nervous. > This can wait until after the branch. If any of the GMs feels confident about it, then there is no reason to wait. Otherwise, we might be better off to hold it a little. -- Joel