From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: implement DW_OP_stack_value and DW_OP_implicit_value
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 23:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909050001.11926.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3eiqm8hm5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
On Friday 04 September 2009 23:33:54, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I added an 'arch' field to piece_closure because we need the objfile's
> architecture when decoding a stack value; I think we can't use the
> frame's architecture because we might not have a frame.
That sounds strange to me. When would we be reading things
off the stack and not have a frame?
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-04 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-02 22:13 Tom Tromey
2009-09-04 22:34 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-04 23:01 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2009-09-04 23:56 ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-11 18:33 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909050001.11926.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox