From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14517 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2009 22:27:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 14505 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Sep 2009 22:27:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:27:28 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC346108C6; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:27:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957F31055A; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:27:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Miboz-000775-Lk; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:27:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:27:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Keith Seitz , Michael Eager , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] dwarf2_physname Message-ID: <20090901222725.GA26894@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Keith Seitz , Michael Eager , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <4A9C358E.2050904@redhat.com> <4A9C54F6.1000909@eagercon.com> <4A9C5A66.7060609@redhat.com> <20090901221122.GA24658@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090901221122.GA24658@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 06:11:22PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I assume this patch is a distant descendant of the one I sent you a > while back. Is its goal to create a useful name for each symbol, or > to match the one produced by some other source - probably the > demangler? What sort of template cases have you looked at? I guess the big picture is that I want to know how these pieces fit together, before trying to figure out if each individual piece is right. It's a hack (IMO!) that we need to generate physnames - but it may be the only practical path which is how I ended up there myself :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery