From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 683 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2009 18:56:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 675 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2009 18:56:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:56:42 +0000 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2009 18:56:39 -0000 Received: from xdsl-87-78-235-133.netcologne.de (EHLO localhost.localdomain) [87.78.235.133] by mail.gmx.net (mp054) with SMTP; 18 Aug 2009 20:56:39 +0200 Received: from ralf by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MdTrJ-00082z-0M; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:56:37 +0200 Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:14:00 -0000 From: Ralf Wildenhues To: Hui Zhu , Michael Snyder Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: rda build on x86_64 Message-ID: <20090818185636.GG30742@gmx.de> References: <20090818053514.GC28254@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-09) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00289.txt.bz2 Hello Michael, Hui, first off, my previous mail-Cc to msnyder at redhat.com bounced ; time to update the entry in rda/MAINTAINERS (which is where I got the email address from)? * Hui Zhu wrote on Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:34:11AM CEST: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 13:35, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > I'm trying to build the full src tree, plain > >  ../src/configure > >  make > > > > on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (on my way of updating autotools in src). > > Looking at configure.in, x86_64 seems simply not supported.  Is a port > > to the new x86_64 architecture planned? > > > > Until then, would it be desirable to let toplevel not configure the rda > > directory on x86_64 to avoid this build error (so the user doesn't have > > to --disable-rda manually)? > ../src/configure --disable-sid --disable-rda --disable-binutils Thanks; however, that is - neither convenient for users not knowing they need a special option to disable rda, - not an option for me when I want to update autotools inside rda or sid. I *need* a way to be able to build *all* parts of the tree (ideally as many as possible together in as few build trees as possible), in order to be able to test changes to the build system. If you tell me the latter is simply not possible on x86_64, then I can go to i686-pc-linux-gnu; that seems to work. Cheers, Ralf