On Thursday 30 July 2009 Tom Tromey wrote:

> >>>>> "Volodya" == Vladimir Prus <vladimir@codesourcery.com> writes:
> 
> Volodya> This revision addresses all the comments above, except that
> Volodya> request for 'closure' pointer to read_command_lines_1 if
> Volodya> addressed by a comment saying why we don't do that.
> 
> There still isn't a header comment on read_next_line.  Just something
> like "helper function for use with recurse_read_control_structure" would
> be fine.  This is ok with the addition of a comment.

Thanks. Checked in with that change, see attached.

- Volodya