From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11017 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2009 21:27:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 11008 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jul 2009 21:27:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:27:46 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA6E1062D; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:27:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED45010555; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:27:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MWdA6-00012A-OJ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:27:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 23:09:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Paul Pluzhnikov Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC][patch] Work around for gold/10400 bug. Message-ID: <20090730212742.GA3955@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Pluzhnikov , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20090722001233.C049876BC0@localhost> <8ac60eac0907221332n70b19febj539b5c866f7fd2f4@mail.gmail.com> <8ac60eac0907291742l285e3f2ah19e4277041ce120d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0907291742l285e3f2ah19e4277041ce120d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00754.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 05:42:44PM -0700, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: > > > Fixed in the updated patch. > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-07/msg00569.html > > Ping? I guess this is OK. It's a bit shorter-lived than most things we have added workarounds for, but it at least has an explanatory comment :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery