From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30316 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2009 18:34:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 30308 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jul 2009 18:34:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:34:27 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5DB1061C for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:34:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B549104E1 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:34:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MWDyp-0002GN-L7 for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:34:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:46:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Support for single-stepping Thumb-2 programs Message-ID: <20090729183423.GA8679@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20090728163645.GA22855@caradoc.them.org> <87tz0wqwpq.wl%naesten@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87tz0wqwpq.wl%naesten@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00713.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 06:17:05PM -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote: > So ... shouldn't this be documented in the manual until you do > implement that single-stepping? I don't think it's needed, but if enough people disagree with me (or someone submits the patch) we can revisit... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery