From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29536 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 2009 02:26:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 29326 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jul 2009 02:26:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:26:27 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4583108A3; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:26:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5152B104DF; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:26:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MQBFC-0007Qs-Tr; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:26:18 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:55:00 -0000 From: "drow@false.org" To: Michael Snyder Cc: Mark Kettenis , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "teawater@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [RFA] epilogue unwinder for i386 (reverse 1/2) Message-ID: <20090713022618.GA28468@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Snyder , Mark Kettenis , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "teawater@gmail.com" References: <4A4EA0F7.1040004@vmware.com> <4A4EA3B3.9030107@vmware.com> <200907051235.n65CZhDb024857@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4A511332.2000607@vmware.com> <4A58D5D7.9070504@vmware.com> <200907121112.n6CBCG1x032181@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4A5A209E.5050202@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A5A209E.5050202@vmware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00354.txt.bz2 On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 10:42:54AM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > Daniel, a heads-up -- this seems to break your test "i386-signal.exp". When checked in, it's our test. I don't think it's appropriate to commit a patch which causes testsuite regressions. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery