From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 957 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2009 08:39:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 949 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2009 08:39:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 08:39:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6B8dV4U014688 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:39:31 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6B8dVTP015091 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:39:31 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6B8dTNU025552 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:39:30 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6B8dStC031610; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:39:28 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n6B8dSsg031605; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:39:28 +0200 Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:25:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Fix warnings using gcc-4.5 HEAD Message-ID: <20090711083928.GA30826@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20090711082502.GA18801@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <200907110836.n6B8a4Yn015392@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200907110836.n6B8a4Yn015392@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00327.txt.bz2 On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:36:05 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Yuck, this is beyond ugly. I agree, just I did not want to comment my patch this way myself. There is no way how to extend 3rd party enum X definition: error: nested redefinition of ‘enum X’ error: redeclaration of ‘enum X’ Thanks, Jan