From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30151 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2009 20:49:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 30140 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jul 2009 20:49:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:49:11 +0000 Received: (qmail 27251 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 20:49:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 8 Jul 2009 20:49:09 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Use data cache for stack accesses Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:58:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Jacob Potter References: <7e6c8d660907081308r13bff580rdcf4822c77df8403@mail.gmail.com> <200907082146.40513.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200907082146.40513.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907082149.12982.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00273.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 08 July 2009 21:46:40, Pedro Alves wrote: > What if we do this within dcache itself, similarly > to get_thread_regcache? =A0That would be probably in memory_xfer_partial. >=20 Sorry, I meant dcache_xfer_partial. --=20 Pedro Alves