From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9687 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2009 13:35:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 9677 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jul 2009 13:35:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:35:41 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C70710967; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:35:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA10108D0; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 13:35:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MOXJC-0000UZ-Q9; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:35:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:35:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pierre Muller Subject: Re: [RFA] Add "inf" alias for "info" Message-ID: <20090708133538.GA1640@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pierre Muller References: <000001c9ffce$8b9b81e0$a2d285a0$@u-strasbg.fr> <200907081423.14012.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20090708132501.GA978@caradoc.them.org> <200907081426.30584.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200907081426.30584.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:26:30PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > On Wednesday 08 July 2009 14:25:01, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:23:13PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > > > Why not type just "i"?  It is already an alias for "info", and, > > > it's shorter anyway ==> less hassle. > > > > While I agree, I think an "inf" alias is fine too. > > > > Can I claim it for "inferior" then? :-P No :-) We've been through this for other new commands - if people use a shortcut, I think we're pretty much obliged to preserve it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery