From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-65230-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11019 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2009 18:22:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 11009 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2009 18:22:24 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:22:17 +0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) 	by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n67IMDpH019523; 	Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:22:13 -0400
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) 	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n67IMBJJ015638; 	Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:22:12 -0400
Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) 	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n67IM9ta023299; 	Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:22:11 -0400
Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n67IM8PV026141; 	Tue, 7 Jul 2009 20:22:09 +0200
Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) 	by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n67IM4QW026124; 	Tue, 7 Jul 2009 20:22:04 +0200
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:22:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: uweigand@de.ibm.com, drow@false.org, tromey@redhat.com,         gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix i386 memory-by-register access on amd64
Message-ID: <20090707182203.GA24153@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
References: <200907071624.n67GO6bj015890@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <200907071759.n67HxhcF026713@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200907071759.n67HxhcF026713@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00209.txt.bz2

On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:59:43 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> But then I don't understand Jan's diff at all.  Linux has its own
> implementation for TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY in linux-nat.c.  Why isn't
> that one used?

Expecting the same problem must affect even non-Linux ptrace usage.  I will
move it to linux-nat.c if you think so.


Thanks,
Jan