From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29910 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2009 15:00:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 29899 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2009 15:00:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_93 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:00:15 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C70108CB; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:00:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27218104AB; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:00:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MOC9U-0005Lo-P4; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:00:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:00:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Tom Tromey Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ob] Correct ovldbreak.exp KFAILs Message-ID: <20090707150012.GB18388@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Tromey , Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20090706192000.GA26561@caradoc.them.org> <200907061941.n66JfJgG029987@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20090706194741.GA6497@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00197.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 08:10:40AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > Yes, I believe there was a reason, but I can't remember it. And, I > can't figure out what it might have been. I assume I was mistaken > about the need for this change. > > I will write a patch to change this back and see what happens. Thanks! I've discovered I failed to check in the patch at top of thread, anyway - so I shall drop it, until we see if we can revert. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery