Re: RFC: %ebp-based backtrace patch

Mark Kettenis
2009-07-07T13:07:55Z

> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:00:40 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 11:57:29PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Makes sense to me. If we have no clue where we are anymore, taking
> > the gamble that %ebp is a valid frame pointer probably has better odds
> > than that %esp points to a valid frame. This will need a comment
> > though. I'll take care of that.
>
> Thank you. Would you like me to check in the code, or will you do
> both together?

I'll take care of it.