From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 964 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2009 13:07:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 818 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2009 13:07:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:07:49 +0000 Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n67D7gf7030945; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:07:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n67D7gUk000889; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:07:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:07:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200907071307.n67D7gUk000889@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: drow@false.org CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, matz@suse.de In-reply-to: <20090707130040.GA11040@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:00:40 -0400) Subject: Re: RFC: %ebp-based backtrace patch References: <20090706183316.GA26074@caradoc.them.org> <200907062157.n66LvSVF007634@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20090707130040.GA11040@caradoc.them.org> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00191.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:00:40 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 11:57:29PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Makes sense to me. If we have no clue where we are anymore, taking > > the gamble that %ebp is a valid frame pointer probably has better odds > > than that %esp points to a valid frame. This will need a comment > > though. I'll take care of that. > > Thank you. Would you like me to check in the code, or will you do > both together? I'll take care of it.