From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10902 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2009 13:00:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 10885 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jul 2009 13:00:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:00:44 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E8F108CB; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:00:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90F1104AB; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:00:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MOAHo-0002sX-FE; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:00:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:00:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, matz@suse.de Subject: Re: RFC: %ebp-based backtrace patch Message-ID: <20090707130040.GA11040@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, matz@suse.de References: <20090706183316.GA26074@caradoc.them.org> <200907062157.n66LvSVF007634@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200907062157.n66LvSVF007634@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00190.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 11:57:29PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Makes sense to me. If we have no clue where we are anymore, taking > the gamble that %ebp is a valid frame pointer probably has better odds > than that %esp points to a valid frame. This will need a comment > though. I'll take care of that. Thank you. Would you like me to check in the code, or will you do both together? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery