From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21626 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2009 19:47:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 21613 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jul 2009 19:47:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_93 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:47:44 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E528410967; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 19:47:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D295F108AF; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 19:47:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MNuAA-0001hB-0G; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:47:42 -0400 Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:47:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis , Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ob] Correct ovldbreak.exp KFAILs Message-ID: <20090706194741.GA6497@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20090706192000.GA26561@caradoc.them.org> <200907061941.n66JfJgG029987@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200907061941.n66JfJgG029987@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00161.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:41:19PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 15:20:00 -0400 > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > > > Tom confirmed for me that GDB is expected to print \3 instead of \003 > > nowadays. > > Sorry, but I think that's a regression; \003 obviously is an octal > character escape sequence, \3 isn't. Tom, could you expand on the reason for the change? On IRC you only mentioned that there was one... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery