From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17462 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2009 10:16:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 17454 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jul 2009 10:16:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:16:50 +0000 Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n66AGQrm030195; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:16:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n66AGPFQ000907; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:16:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:16:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200907061016.n66AGPFQ000907@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: gingold@adacore.com CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Tristan Gingold on Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:08:23 +0200) Subject: Re: [RFA Darwin]: Add push_dummy_call for i386 References: <20090703155152.GA76089@ulanbator.act-europe.fr> <200907031648.n63Gm7Wn019605@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00133.txt.bz2 > From: Tristan Gingold > Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:08:23 +0200 > > On Jul 3, 2009, at 6:48 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > >> + static int > >> + i386_darwin_arg_type_alignment (struct type *type) > >> + { > >> + type = check_typedef (type); > >> + /* Passing arguments. > >> + 5. The caller places 64-bit vectors (__m64) on the > >> parameter area, > >> + aligned to 8-byte boundaries. > > > > "on the parameter area"? Probably a type. > > I quoted LowLevelABI.pdf. What is wrong in this sentence ? (Keep > in mind that I am not a native english speaker!) Heh well, if it is a quotation, better not change it. But perhaps the comment should indicate this is a quotation from the ABI document?