From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-65057-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 19235 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2009 19:10:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 19226 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2009 19:10:19 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from pool-98-110-183-121.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (98.110.183.121)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:10:14 +0000
Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) 	by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C2A3B0008; 	Wed,  1 Jul 2009 15:10:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) 	id 8D04159B0FA; Wed,  1 Jul 2009 15:10:04 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:10:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>
To: 'Daniel Jacobowitz' <drow@false.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, 	Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, 	Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Subject: Re: [RFC-v2] Add windows Thread Information Block
Message-ID: <20090701191004.GB8369@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Mail-Followup-To: 'Daniel Jacobowitz' <drow@false.org>, 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>, 	Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
References: <000901c9f5ef$4ee06f10$eca14d30$@u-strasbg.fr> <001f01c9fa5a$0e1297f0$2a37c7d0$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090701181013.GA8215@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <200907011921.15134.pedro@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200907011921.15134.pedro@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 07:21:14PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
>On Wednesday 01 July 2009 19:10:13, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Do we really have to reinvent this structure here?  ?Can't we use a
>>Windows header definition rather than inventing our own?
>>
>
>We can't.  We need it for cross gdb configurations too.  But I'm not
>sure the structure will still appear as is, if Pierre updates the patch
>to implement $_tid.

It's unreasonable to assume that a cross gdb configuration which
understands Windows would be able to use the w32api header files?

cgf