From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15005 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2009 18:01:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 14636 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2009 18:01:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_23,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:01:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 3708 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 18:01:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 1 Jul 2009 18:01:05 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Doug Evans Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix too many "no debugging symbols found" warnings. Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:01:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20090523232414.BED2B846C2@localhost> <83zlbo2t2p.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907011902.19110.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 01 July 2009 18:52:50, Doug Evans wrote: > Does anyone have any other concerns with the patch? Does this mean that there will be no way anymore to say that you don't want symbol loading info? I was assuming we'd still have that option. :-/ I find "set print symbol-loading-warnings" a bit misnamed, since this isn't about *all* warnings. In fact, it's about *no* symbols. I don't really want to get bishedy, but, why was it that keeping the existing option and adding a new one wasn't good? set print symbol-loading on|off set print no-symbols-found-warnings on|off -- Pedro Alves