From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-65044-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26369 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2009 17:18:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 26360 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2009 17:18:00 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:17:55 +0000
Received: (qmail 9456 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 17:17:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 1 Jul 2009 17:17:54 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Subject: Re: [RFC-v2] Add windows Thread Information Block
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:18:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
References: <000901c9f5ef$4ee06f10$eca14d30$@u-strasbg.fr> <200907011643.45759.pedro@codesourcery.com> <002701c9fa66$50823ad0$f186b070$@u-strasbg.fr>
In-Reply-To: <002701c9fa66$50823ad0$f186b070$@u-strasbg.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200907011819.07643.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2

[ sorry, missed one question ]

On Wednesday 01 July 2009 17:09:30, Pierre Muller wrote:
>=20
> =A0 One more question:
> =A0 What if we switch from debugging a win32 application to a win64,
> will the type of $_tib be also recomputed correctly?

Yes.  The type is a gdbarch property (of the frame of the
current thread).  For $_siginfo, the same function linux_get_siginfo_type
handles both x86 and amd64, because the structures are mostly
equivalent, but it's just as easy to install different
gdbarch callbacks on i386-cygwin-tdep.c and amd64-windows-tdep.c.

--=20
Pedro Alves