From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-65051-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30192 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2009 18:04:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 30178 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2009 18:04:35 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from pool-98-110-183-121.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (98.110.183.121)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:04:30 +0000
Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) 	by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1343F3B0008; 	Wed,  1 Jul 2009 14:04:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) 	id 0281E588E79; Wed,  1 Jul 2009 14:04:20 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:04:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, drow@false.org, 	Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>, 	Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC-v2] Add windows Thread Information Block
Message-ID: <20090701180419.GA8152@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, drow@false.org, 	Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>, 	Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <000901c9f5ef$4ee06f10$eca14d30$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090626155254.GA15627@caradoc.them.org> <001f01c9fa5a$0e1297f0$2a37c7d0$@u-strasbg.fr> <831vp047u8.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <831vp047u8.fsf@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 08:43:43PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
>> Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:41:44 +0200
>> 
>> info w32 thread-information-block 
>> with 
>> info w32 tib 
>> as an alias.
>
>This is good.
>
>>   Concerning the documentation, I would also like that we 
>> first decide if we want it to become
>> "info thread-information-block" or stay 
>> "info w32 thread-information-block".
>
>As long as it is a Windows-only feature, "info w32" is more
>appropriate.

Agreed.

cgf