From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28608 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2009 13:59:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 28597 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2009 13:59:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:59:02 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CBD108CC; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:59:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D956810597; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:58:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MLdrO-00059l-Pa; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:58:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:59:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [mi] -stack-list-arguments --simple-values Message-ID: <20090630135858.GA19771@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200906301339.30711.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200906301339.30711.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00869.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 01:39:30PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > This patch makes -stack-list-arguments --simple-values work. > It looks like --simple-values (and friends) were accepted for > -stack-list-locals, but not for -stack-list-arguments. While > the utility of such human friendly spelling is unclear, for > a machine interface, it's even more confusing having 1/2 > of relevant commands accept it. Was this already in the manual? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery