Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>,
		Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>,
		Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Patch to fix reverse return from subroutine error
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 19:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090627195552.GA7049@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906272049.36692.pedro@codesourcery.com>

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 08:49:35PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > -         || execution_direction == EXEC_REVERSE))
> > +         || (execution_direction == EXEC_REVERSE
> > +             && ecs->event_thread->step_frame_id.stack_addr_p
> > +             && get_frame_id (get_current_frame ()).stack_addr_p
> > +              && !gdbarch_inner_than (current_gdbarch,
> > +                                     ecs->event_thread->step_frame_id.stack_addr,
> > +                                     get_frame_id
> 
> Sorry to pitch in so late, but this doesn't look right to me.
> Common code shouldn't be accessing frame id members directly, frame ids
> are supposed to be opaque.  What is this trying to do?

Nor should it be using gdbarch_inner_than this way; Ulrich just got
through removing most of those.  Stack frames do not necessarily need
to be inner than the previous frame.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-27 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-11  8:27 Hui Zhu
2009-06-27 18:59 ` Michael Snyder
2009-06-27 19:48   ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-27 19:56     ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2009-06-27 20:59     ` Michael Snyder
2009-06-27 21:12       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-06-28 18:46         ` Michael Snyder
2009-06-28 21:09           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-06-29  0:38             ` Hui Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090627195552.GA7049@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
    --cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=teawater@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox