From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11811 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2009 16:18:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 11796 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2009 16:18:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:18:14 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919341062D; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:18:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759F0105BB; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:18:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MKE7v-0004a4-47; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:18:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:18:00 -0000 From: 'Daniel Jacobowitz' To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Add windows Thread Information Block Message-ID: <20090626161811.GA17452@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <000901c9f5ef$4ee06f10$eca14d30$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090626155254.GA15627@caradoc.them.org> <000901c9f678$b5946700$20bd3500$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000901c9f678$b5946700$20bd3500$@u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00732.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 06:11:05PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote: > > You'd probably want a new 'target object' for this, and a qXfer packet > > to read it. Take a look at "info auxv", which is very similar. > > Is it OK, to add a target method that is only supported by one > specific target? A TARGET_OBJECT_FOO is generally OK for a single target. So is the remote packet. You shouldn't need any new methods, though. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery