From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-64842-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2911 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2009 16:11:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 2903 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2009 16:11:43 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from pool-98-110-183-121.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (98.110.183.121)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:11:35 +0000
Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) 	by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A64D3B0008; 	Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:11:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) 	id 138072B388; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:11:26 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:11:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add windows Thread Information Block
Message-ID: <20090626161125.GA30471@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
References: <000901c9f5ef$4ee06f10$eca14d30$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090626154512.GG30070@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <000601c9f678$3f3312f0$bd9938d0$@u-strasbg.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <000601c9f678$3f3312f0$bd9938d0$@u-strasbg.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00729.txt.bz2

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 06:07:46PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
>
>
>> From Christopher Faylor
>
>> I can't tell you how many times I've wanted something like this.  I
>> always end up standing on my head to get the tib information.  I have
>> no
>> problem with most of the implementation except that I think this should
>> be a show command not a stand-alone command.  And, while "tib" is an
>> accepted abbreviation for "thread information block", I think it makes
>> sense (as Eli was implying, I think) that the actual command should be
>> "show thread-information-block" with "show tib" as a alias.
>
>With my patch, the command is "info w32 tib"
>but I can change it to 
>"show thread-information-block" if you prefer,
>and if the show subcommands can handle the parsing of args.

Oops.  Sorry.  I missed the class_info.  Nevermind.  info is fine.

cgf