From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-64806-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26601 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2009 22:58:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 26591 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jun 2009 22:58:10 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:58:00 +0000
Received: (qmail 16995 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2009 22:57:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2)   by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 25 Jun 2009 22:57:59 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,  tromey@redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFC: parallelize "make check"
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:58:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <m34ou5ig9e.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <m34ou5ig9e.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200906252359.02953.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00693.txt.bz2

On Wednesday 24 June 2009 20:27:41, Tom Tromey wrote:
> After running the tests in parallel, it combines them using a script
> from gcc's contrib directory. =A0I just copied this into gdb/testsuite/,
> but that might not be best.

Of course, the best solution is to put gcc/contrib in its own git
repository and share it with gdb.  :-P

[[[ seriously, am I the only one that would prefer that gdb and
the whole of src move into the same repository as gcc, which
would allow easier sharing of code between the projects, and
more easily spring up new shared libraries?  Think reusing
bits of gcc in gdb :-) (other than libiberty).  Wasn't svn gaining
support for modules a-la cvs? ]]]

Okay, sorry for hijacking.  Please ignore.  Great stuff, Tom!

--=20
Pedro Alves