From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13315 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2009 03:19:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 13305 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jun 2009 03:19:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_37 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:18:57 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7085510D71; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:18:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2120C10D6C; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:18:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MIwX7-0000fA-ND; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:18:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:19:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, vladimir@codesourcery.com, chgenly@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb.texinfo patch for -var-list-children (2) Message-ID: <20090623031853.GA2487@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , brobecker@adacore.com, vladimir@codesourcery.com, chgenly@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20090622031832.GA7766@adacore.com> <20090622150201.GA10191@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00601.txt.bz2 On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:00:31PM -0400, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > As for patch, I recently discovered --unified-reject-files - very useful. > > Right, but that option is only available in the unofficial beta > versions of Patch. Many users are unlikely to have it. The latest > official release doesn't support such an option. (And then there's > the issue with tools that use Patch as their back-end, and don't let > you use this option easily.) Huh, thanks. I didn't know that; Debian's packages imported the option 3.5 years ago. I actually use it with one such tool (quilt) :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery