From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-64578-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7751 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2009 06:31:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 7742 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2009 06:31:42 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:31:36 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n5I6TtnM010414; 	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:29:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n5I6TsBx026295; 	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:29:54 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:31:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200906180629.n5I6TsBx026295@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: brobecker@adacore.com
CC: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20090617231843.GC14549@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker 	on Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:18:43 -0700)
Subject: Re: [RFC] Improve testsuite for poor expect behavior
References: <20090613150505.GA28157@caradoc.them.org> <000001c9ec65$9bf13ca0$d3d3b5e0$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090613235454.GA1893@caradoc.them.org> <20090614002516.GO25703@adacore.com> <000001c9ed8a$21cfdc30$656f9490$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090616145756.GB7730@adacore.com> <000c01c9eeda$022d8a70$06889f50$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090617133626.GA24310@caradoc.them.org> <001a01c9ef9c$29d21420$7d763c60$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090617224255.GA11265@caradoc.them.org> <20090617231843.GC14549@adacore.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00465.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:18:43 -0700
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
> > >   Could we use something that would also work for Win64 compilation?
> > 
> > Sure, if you tell us what it is - I figured _WIN32 still worked.
> 
> As far as I can tell, _WIN32 *is* defined for Win64 as well.

Ah brilliant!  Another reason we should try to avoid using #ifdef
_WIN32 and the likes in generic GDB code.