From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-64577-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14165 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2009 23:21:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 14157 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jun 2009 23:21:07 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:20:56 +0000
Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AC67C09B; 	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:20:54 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) 	by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E547C09A; 	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:20:54 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) 	(envelope-from <drow@caradoc.them.org>) 	id 1MH4R3-0003pq-Hi; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:20:53 -0400
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:21:00 -0000
From: 'Daniel Jacobowitz' <drow@false.org>
To: Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: 'Joel Brobecker' <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Improve testsuite for poor expect behavior
Message-ID: <20090617232053.GA14725@caradoc.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>, 	'Joel Brobecker' <brobecker@adacore.com>, 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
References: <000001c9ec65$9bf13ca0$d3d3b5e0$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090613235454.GA1893@caradoc.them.org> <20090614002516.GO25703@adacore.com> <000001c9ed8a$21cfdc30$656f9490$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090616145756.GB7730@adacore.com> <000c01c9eeda$022d8a70$06889f50$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090617133626.GA24310@caradoc.them.org> <001a01c9ef9c$29d21420$7d763c60$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090617224255.GA11265@caradoc.them.org> <001d01c9ef9e$4e90bf30$ebb23d90$@u-strasbg.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <001d01c9ef9e$4e90bf30$ebb23d90$@u-strasbg.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00464.txt.bz2

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:52:34AM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
>   Is attribute (constructor) is
> allowed in GDB code?

Not generally, but we might be able to use it in a mingw-specific file.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery