From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9955 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2009 00:25:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 9926 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2009 00:25:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:25:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686072BAB07; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:25:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rpGQwPGRncLe; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:25:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434E22BAB06; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:25:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1CAA3F596C; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:25:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:25:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Improve testsuite for poor expect behavior Message-ID: <20090614002516.GO25703@adacore.com> References: <001201c9ebb1$96414b10$c2c3e130$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090613150505.GA28157@caradoc.them.org> <000001c9ec65$9bf13ca0$d3d3b5e0$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090613235454.GA1893@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090613235454.GA1893@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00365.txt.bz2 > I see, I didn't realize that. I still think it would be better to fix > this in GDB rather than complicate the testsuite, though. I vaguely > remember Joel proposing a variable to make GDB pretend there was a > terminal? Yeah - we use that in two situations, one of them being our testsuite. I can resend if it helps. -- Joel