From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2083 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2009 19:23:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 2074 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jun 2009 19:23:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:23:09 +0000 Received: (qmail 5271 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2009 19:23:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 10 Jun 2009 19:23:07 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: "Ulrich Weigand" Subject: Re: [01/15] Introduce get_current_arch () function Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:23:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com References: <200906101826.n5AIQ4sK013668@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200906101826.n5AIQ4sK013668@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906102024.15480.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00272.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 10 June 2009 19:26:04, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Typically, the architecture is consulted to retrieve properties the > value inherently has, so using the arch used at value creation seems > correct. =A0However, I'm sure there will be places where using a value > from one arch in the context of another current arch may not work > quite as expected yet ...=20 Yeah. Just 'p func($1)' or 'p $2 + 1.1f' are some "simple" examples. > I didn't attempt to address all these=20 > issues with the current patch series yet. You're doing an Herculian job already! --=20 Pedro Alves