From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16917 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2009 15:05:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 16908 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jun 2009 15:05:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:05:27 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0144F10738; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:05:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8AD10728; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:05:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MEPMh-0001En-RN; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:05:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:05:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: Julian Brown , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Displaced stepping (non-stop debugging) support for ARM Linux Message-ID: <20090610150523.GA4472@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , Julian Brown , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20090120221355.46ac23e6@rex.config> <20090516191910.14820805@rex.config> <20090609173709.GA10846@caradoc.them.org> <200906101559.46860.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200906101559.46860.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00254.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 03:59:46PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > It would be nice to have that fixed, for sure, so yes to the > we should fix that question. However, it seems to me that this > is something that can be worked on mostly independently of the ARM > bits as it's a general software single-step issue, not really ARM > specific. Unless someone wants to (and has time to) tackle it > right now, I'd say go with the always displace-step version. If > nothing else, helps in stressing the displaced stepping > implementation. :-) Agreed - let's merge the always-displace patch for now. > Care must be taken to keep Thanks for the plan. I suspect this is too much to insist on before this patch goes in :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery