From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3560 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2009 16:59:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 3545 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jun 2009 16:59:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:59:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 24652 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2009 16:59:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 8 Jun 2009 16:59:14 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix bug in add_alias_cmd Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:59:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , Pierre Muller References: <006001c9e6be$6fad8fb0$4f08af10$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090608162609.GA25155@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20090608162609.GA25155@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906081800.14160.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00187.txt.bz2 On Monday 08 June 2009 17:26:09, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Any idea how long this has been broken? > > If it's been several releases, it's likely we can remove gdb -xdb. I thought the same. But, this is post-6.8 breakage. I also wondered if "ubreak" was a typo for something else, like "tbreak". Does anyone actually know what "ub" was supposed to do in xdb? Maybe "unbreak" -- remove breakpoint? Just curiosity, I've never used xdb, or known someone that actually used the -xdb mode in gdb. -- Pedro Alves