From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5076 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2009 16:26:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 5063 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jun 2009 16:26:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:26:11 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA4E10F6B; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 16:26:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (209.195.188.212.nauticom.net [209.195.188.212]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028F710F6A; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 16:26:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MDhfl-0006Y3-7T; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:26:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:26:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix bug in add_alias_cmd Message-ID: <20090608162609.GA25155@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <006001c9e6be$6fad8fb0$4f08af10$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <006001c9e6be$6fad8fb0$4f08af10$@u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-05-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00186.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 05:49:53PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote: > > Out of curiosity, I tried to start > gdb with --xdb options to see the special > options that this provides. > > I got this: > $ ./gdb -xdb > ../../purecvs/gdb/cli/cli-decode.c:255: internal-error: add_alias_cmd: > Assertion > `!aliases && !prehook && prehookee && !posthook && ! posthookee' failed. Any idea how long this has been broken? If it's been several releases, it's likely we can remove gdb -xdb. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery