From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6505 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2009 18:15:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 6496 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jun 2009 18:15:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:15:05 +0000 Received: (qmail 6048 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2009 18:15:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 7 Jun 2009 18:15:03 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: danny.backx@scarlet.be Subject: Re: Patch : gdbserver get_image_name on CE Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:15:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1244366297.11918.210.camel@pavilion> <200906071804.37208.pedro@codesourcery.com> <1244397699.11918.216.camel@pavilion> In-Reply-To: <1244397699.11918.216.camel@pavilion> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906071916.03048.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2 On Sunday 07 June 2009 19:01:39, Danny Backx wrote: > Feel free to ignore these patches until they're complete, if that is a > better idea. It's fine to send unfinished patches for comments, if you'd like, but please say so explicitly, so I don't waste time trying to understand what they're for, for nothing. > I sent this one separately because it looked contained. Thanks for doing that. Splitting self contained patches is always good. In this case, x86 desktop and ARM CE are different in that: - ARM CE stores dll names in unicode. - ARM CE's dll event reports the address of the dll name. - x86 desktop stores dll names in ascii. - x86 desktop's dll event reports a pointer to the address of the dll name. It may be that x86 CE is a mix of the two: - stores dll names in unicode: - x86 CE's dll event reports a pointer to the address of the dll name. But this is just guessing. -- Pedro Alves