From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28489 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2009 16:06:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 28473 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jun 2009 16:06:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:06:31 +0000 Received: (qmail 7658 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2009 16:06:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 6 Jun 2009 16:06:28 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Tom Tromey Subject: Re: Move the multi-forks support to the generic multi-inferiors support. Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:06:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200905310013.38916.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906061707.21594.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00151.txt.bz2 On Saturday 06 June 2009 01:07:29, Tom Tromey wrote: > How about this? It adds the column headings and prints something when > there are no inferiors. This is fine with me, thanks, but, are you planning on doing something similar to "info threads" output? IMO, both these commands should be consistent. In that case, you may have an issue with MI, as it calls print_thread_info --- I don't know if using a table instead of a list changes MI output. (I was a bit surprised to (re-)find that MI doesn't use print_inferior) -- Pedro Alves