Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: uweigand@de.ibm.com (Ulrich Weigand)
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [rfc] Remove current_gdbarch register handling from symbol readers
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906041235.n54CZxke005634@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905201503.n4KF3ofO011061@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> from "Ulrich Weigand" at May 20, 2009 05:03:50 PM

> this patch removes most of the remaining instances of current_gdbarch 
> from the symbol readers.  These are all related to handling register
> numbers.   The problem is that during symbol reading, we may not
> actually know the GDB register numbers for the target -- those may
> change once we actually connect to a target which may provide its
> own target description.
> 
> What the patch does is to delay register renaming by storing the
> original number from the debug info into SYMBOL_VALUE, and perform
> the conversion to a GDB register number only when debug info is
> actually used -- at which time we must have a frame context in
> order to evaluate "register" symbols, so we can use the correct
> architecture.
> 
> This is implemented by extending the SYMBOL_OPS field, which is
> currently only used for LOC_COMPUTED types, to also provide
> callback routine for LOC_REGISTER (and LOC_REGPARM_ADDR) types.
> All symbol readers using those types are adapted to provide
> an appropriate implementation of the callback.

I've now checked in this patch as well.

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-04 12:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-20 15:04 Ulrich Weigand
2009-05-20 17:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-05-21  0:52   ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-05-21  3:27     ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-05-25 13:15       ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-05-25 20:59         ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-05-26 19:01           ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-06-04 12:36 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200906041235.n54CZxke005634@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com \
    --to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox