From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9184 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2009 14:06:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 9176 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jun 2009 14:06:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_37,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:06:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 28950 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2009 14:06:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.local) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 3 Jun 2009 14:06:12 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Doug Evans Subject: Re: [RFC] Allowing all threads of all|current process(es) to be resumed [new command + docs] Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:06:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200905301151.52892.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200905312307.03257.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906031506.49724.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On Monday 01 June 2009 16:55:39, Doug Evans wrote: > I guess I'm a bit confused (no claim is made that that's unexpected :-)). > I was offering an alternative. I'd still like to hear what you think > of adding a modifier to "continue", etc. instead. I'm not wedded to > it of course. In part it seemed like a good time to talk about the > two alternatives. Well, it obviously sounds like something reasonable to have. OTOH, so does the HPD's ptset prefix notation, something like '(gdb) [1.2:4] step'. Of course, the -t switch could be easily added today... -- Pedro Alves