From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26392 invoked by alias); 29 May 2009 07:40:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 26377 invoked by uid 22791); 29 May 2009 07:40:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 May 2009 07:40:21 +0000 Received: (qmail 1198 invoked from network); 29 May 2009 07:40:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wind.localnet) (vladimir@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 29 May 2009 07:40:20 -0000 From: Vladimir Prus To: "Pierre Muller" Subject: Re: TR: ARI warning list change Fri May 29 01:53:26 UTC 2009 Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:40:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.90 (Linux/2.6.24-24-generic; KDE/4.2.68; i686; svn-948090; 2009-04-01) Cc: tromey@redhat.com, "'Thiago Jung Bauermann'" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <000001c9e02a$034bb030$09e31090$@u-strasbg.fr> In-Reply-To: <000001c9e02a$034bb030$09e31090$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200905291140.18693.vladimir@codesourcery.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00616.txt.bz2 On Friday 29 May 2009 10:52:19 Pierre Muller wrote: > Here is another example of the email that is generated > by my patch to update-web-ari. >=20 > It seems like you have forgotten a bunch of _()=20 > macros. >=20 > A possible improvement would be to send this message directly to > people that committed a change to the sources that > generated a new warning. >=20 > Is it possible to extract the commits > from the last 24 hours to find out to whom this kind of message should be > sent? >=20 > Pierre Muller > Still trying to improve ARI. >=20 >=20 > -----Message d'origine----- > De : GDB Administrator [mailto:gdbadmin@sourceware.org]=20 > Envoy=E9 : Friday, May 29, 2009 3:53 AM > =C0 : muller@sourceware.org > Objet : ARI warning list change Fri May 29 01:53:26 UTC 2009 >=20 > 657a658,659 > > gdb/mi/mi-cmd-var.c:251: gettext: _ markup: All messages should be mark= ed > up with _. > > gdb/mi/mi-cmd-var.c:256: gettext: _ markup: All messages should be mark= ed > up with _. > 837a840,846 > > gdb/varobj.c:853: gettext: _ markup: All messages should be marked up w= ith > _. > > gdb/varobj.c:859: gettext: _ markup: All messages should be marked up w= ith > _. > > gdb/varobj.c:865: gettext: _ markup: All messages should be marked up w= ith > _. > > gdb/varobj.c:882: gettext: _ markup: All messages should be marked up w= ith > _. > > gdb/varobj.c:1386: gettext: _ markup: All messages should be marked up > with _. > > gdb/varobj.c:1457: gettext: _ markup: All messages should be marked up > with _. > > gdb/varobj.c:1470: gettext: _ markup: All messages should be marked up > with _. > 1204d1212 > < gdb/value.c:529: deprecated: deprecated value_address_hack: Do not use > deprecated value_address_hack, see declaration for details > 1395,1396d1402 > < gdb/value.h:278: deprecated: deprecated value_address_hack: Do not use > deprecated value_address_hack, see declaration for details > < gdb/value.h:279: deprecated: deprecated value_address_hack: Do not use > deprecated value_address_hack, see declaration for details I am missing context on this email, but at least in MI, it's not yet clear which messages should be i18n and which are not. Some are results of fronte= nd coding bug and as such should be never presented to user and should not be ever translated. And if they are translated, they won't help the user but will make it harder to understand the error for developer. - Volodya