Re: [RFA]: handle_extended_wait: Call linux_resume_one_lwp instead of ptrace

[Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>]

On Sunday 24 May 2009 04:14:22, Doug Evans wrote:

> There are some things that linux_resume_one_lwp does that either
> all callers of ptrace (PTRACE_CONT) should do (check errno)
> or would be nice to do (print a debugging message).
> I was thinking of splitting linux_resume_one_lwp into two,
> but since the newly created thread is, well, new the rest of
> linux_resume_one_lwp is a nop; so it seems reasonable to just call
> linux_resume_one_lwp for the new thread.
> It's also nice to have all calls to ptrace (PTRACE_CONT)
> routed through one function.

Agreed.  It doesn't look like there are extra syscalls and
it's all O(1) in that fast path.

> 
> Ok to check in?
> [tested on amd64 w/ --target_board=native-gdbserver, no regressions]
> 
> 2009-05-23  Doug Evans  <dje@google.com>
> 
> 	* linux-low.c (handle_extended_wait): Use linux_resume_one_lwp
> 	to resume the newly created thread, don't call ptrace (PTRACE_CONT)
> 	directly.

Ok.

-- 
Pedro Alves