From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1151 invoked by alias); 20 May 2009 05:23:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 1142 invoked by uid 22791); 20 May 2009 05:23:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_22 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 May 2009 05:23:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6471C2BAC54; Wed, 20 May 2009 01:23:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id w9mYB7TVDJxp; Wed, 20 May 2009 01:23:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748742BAC2F; Wed, 20 May 2009 01:23:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D8FB1F5962; Wed, 20 May 2009 07:22:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 05:23:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Send new ARI warnings to gdb_testers mailing list Message-ID: <20090520052257.GB16152@adacore.com> References: <001801c9c397$0e35ba90$2aa12fb0$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090423184213.GE7552@adacore.com> <013401c9ca3e$852e58c0$8f8b0a40$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090506163051.GL10734@adacore.com> <001d01c9ce6a$1d6d7e20$58487a60$@u-strasbg.fr> <001001c9d85c$940312b0$bc093810$@u-strasbg.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001001c9d85c$940312b0$bc093810$@u-strasbg.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00414.txt.bz2 FWIW: > >>>>>>>>>> Email Title > ARI warning list change Tue May 19 01:55:11 UTC 2009 > >>>>>>>>>> Start of email body > 1049a1046,1047 > > gdb/lm32-tdep.c:293: deprecate: write_memory: Replace write_memory() with > regcache_read() et.al. > > gdb/lm32-tdep.c:337: deprecate: read_memory: Replace read_memory() with > regcache_read() et.al. > 58,59d57 > < gdb/doublest.h:96: deprecated: deprecated extract_floating: Do not use > deprecated extract_floating, see declaration for details > < gdb/doublest.h:97: deprecated: deprecated store_floating: Do not use > deprecated store_floating, see declaration for details > 106d103 > < gdb/ada-lang.c:1695: deprecated: deprecated set_value_type: Do not use > deprecated set_value_type, see declaration for details > 163d159 > < gdb/sh64-tdep.c:1580: deprecated: deprecated extract_floating: Do not use > deprecated extract_floating, see declaration for details > 1600,1601d1597 > < gdb/doublest.c:822: deprecated: deprecated extract_floating: Do not use > deprecated extract_floating, see declaration for details > < gdb/doublest.c:839: deprecated: deprecated store_floating: Do not use > deprecated store_floating, see declaration for details > >>>>>>>>>> End of email Can we just get the lines that start with "> "? As far as I can tell, we don't really need the "< " lines, since these are good news. The hunk headers (eg: 1600,1601d1597) are not really useful either. > Should I change the email address to gdb-testers? I would personally be OK with that; and I even think that this would be useful if all we were sending is the new regressions. Having the line number where the regression appeared is great. -- Joel