From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16766 invoked by alias); 19 May 2009 13:52:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 16757 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2009 13:52:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 May 2009 13:52:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4JDqVOZ031787 for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 09:52:31 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n4JDqUkk014320; Tue, 19 May 2009 09:52:30 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4JDqSRf012343; Tue, 19 May 2009 09:52:29 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4JDqR06026777; Tue, 19 May 2009 15:52:28 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n4JDqR07026776; Tue, 19 May 2009 15:52:27 +0200 Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:52:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Remove unused PROT from openp() Message-ID: <20090519135226.GA26737@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20090515230206.GA14982@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00397.txt.bz2 On Tue, 19 May 2009 00:38:05 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > This is ok. Thanks. Checked-in. http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2009-05/msg00125.html Thanks, Jan