From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28940 invoked by alias); 18 May 2009 17:31:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 28932 invoked by uid 22791); 18 May 2009 17:31:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 May 2009 17:31:44 +0000 Received: (qmail 27546 invoked from network); 18 May 2009 17:31:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 18 May 2009 17:31:42 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Paul Pluzhnikov Subject: Re: Add base linux native multi-process support. Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:31:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey References: <200904072056.04727.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200905181444.53703.pedro@codesourcery.com> <8ac60eac0905181010t3be634f7tac954fc4ab6486f5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8ac60eac0905181010t3be634f7tac954fc4ab6486f5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905181831.42153.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00369.txt.bz2 A Monday 18 May 2009 18:10:06, Paul Pluzhnikov escreveu: > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Pedro Alves wro= te: > > On Monday 18 May 2009 03:27:00, Pedro Alves wrote: >=20 > >> In a multi-process world, I don't think we can make this conditioning > >> on last_loaded be sensible anymore. >=20 > I agree. >=20 > I don't really think this conditioning is that great in single-process > mode either. I just did it to replicate current behavior. >=20 > > I think this is the only detail that may > > need sorting out, if at all, so I think I'll go ahead with the patch, > > and offer myself to fix this bit if needed. =A0If should be easier for > > Paul to try it out as well this way (just cvs up!). >=20 > I just built and tested this with several different libthread_db's. > I don't see any problems :-) That's just super! Thanks! --=20 Pedro Alves