From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16171 invoked by alias); 15 May 2009 09:29:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 16162 invoked by uid 22791); 15 May 2009 09:29:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 May 2009 09:29:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E717C2BAD03; Fri, 15 May 2009 05:29:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id PauwUHwpCz6Y; Fri, 15 May 2009 05:29:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC4A2BACF5; Fri, 15 May 2009 05:29:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C0A0DF5962; Fri, 15 May 2009 11:29:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:29:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix my email addresses Message-ID: <20090515092939.GJ7292@adacore.com> References: <003601c9d4d7$30f835c0$92e8a140$@u-strasbg.fr> <83skj6rgwp.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83skj6rgwp.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00320.txt.bz2 > > Should I really add this entry to ChangeLog, > > or commit it without ChangeLog entry? > > Personally, I think that such changes don't need a ChangeLog entry, > but since my opinions about ChangeLog's are more often than not > overruled by the majority of other developers, please wait for someone > else to speak up. I agree with Eli, changes to the ChangeLog don't need an associated ChangeLog entry. -- Joel