From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20299 invoked by alias); 11 May 2009 19:16:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 20281 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2009 19:16:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 May 2009 19:16:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AEE62BAC75; Mon, 11 May 2009 15:16:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id KnLg3hqaG-Hy; Mon, 11 May 2009 15:16:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D61E2BAC79; Mon, 11 May 2009 15:16:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 80B18F5901; Mon, 11 May 2009 12:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 19:16:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Doug Evans Subject: Re: [RFC] i386/amd64 biarch gdbserver Message-ID: <20090511191642.GF14773@adacore.com> References: <20090509191225.404D984890@localhost> <200905111850.46214.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200905111850.46214.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00223.txt.bz2 > This looks good to me, but, I don't know how far can I stretch in > gdbserver approvals. As far as I can tell, there are not that many active maintainers that work on gdbserver. It used to be mostly Daniel who approved patches. You're responsible for most of the changes this year, so I would personally say that you're one of the most qualified. -- Joel