From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4952 invoked by alias); 11 May 2009 12:24:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 4935 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2009 12:24:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 May 2009 12:24:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A9F2BAC0E; Mon, 11 May 2009 08:24:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Z9qbhIH8s8So; Mon, 11 May 2009 08:24:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DAB2BAC11; Mon, 11 May 2009 08:24:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2950CF5901; Mon, 11 May 2009 05:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 12:24:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Hui Zhu , Paul Pluzhnikov , tromey@redhat.com, Thiago Jung Bauermann , Eli Zaretskii , Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [patch][rfc] Allow GDB to search for the right libthread_db.so.1 Message-ID: <20090511122405.GC11782@adacore.com> References: <8ac60eac0904221810x24763ecaj4a888927b766e7f7@mail.gmail.com> <20090505033835.GH10734@adacore.com> <200905111234.23748.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200905111234.23748.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00211.txt.bz2 > Hi guys, what's the status on this patch? As far as I know, we are now in agreement of what the behavior should be, but it's awaiting review... -- Joel