From: dje@google.com (Doug Evans)
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [RFA]: Clean up debug printing of pc in gdbserver
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 03:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090507031109.0CBFB84890@localhost> (raw)
Hi.
The debug printing of pc in linux-i386-low.c/linux-x86-64-low.c can
use some clean up.
- why restrict the printing to just x86?
- the text that is printed for linux_resume_one_lwp is confusing
Ok to check in?
2009-05-06 Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
* linux-x86-64-low.c (debug_threads): Remove declaration.
(x86_64_get_pc,x86_64_set_pc): Remove debug printing of pc.
* linux-i386-low.c (debug_threads): Remove declaration.
(i386_get_pc,i386_set_pc): Remove debug printing of pc.
* linux-low.c (get_stop_pc): Print pc if debug_threads.
(check_removed_breakpoint, linux_wait_for_lwp): Ditto.
(linux_resume_one_lwp): Ditto.
Index: linux-low.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c,v
retrieving revision 1.99
diff -u -p -r1.99 linux-low.c
--- linux-low.c 6 May 2009 17:32:59 -0000 1.99
+++ linux-low.c 7 May 2009 02:10:55 -0000
@@ -290,10 +290,14 @@ get_stop_pc (void)
{
CORE_ADDR stop_pc = (*the_low_target.get_pc) ();
- if (get_thread_lwp (current_inferior)->stepping)
- return stop_pc;
- else
- return stop_pc - the_low_target.decr_pc_after_break;
+ if (! get_thread_lwp (current_inferior)->stepping)
+ stop_pc -= the_low_target.decr_pc_after_break;
+
+ if (debug_threads)
+ fprintf (stderr, "stop pc is %08lx\n",
+ (long) stop_pc);
+
+ return stop_pc;
}
static void *
@@ -750,7 +754,11 @@ check_removed_breakpoint (struct lwp_inf
decrement. We go immediately from this function to resuming,
and can not safely call get_stop_pc () again. */
if (the_low_target.set_pc != NULL)
- (*the_low_target.set_pc) (stop_pc);
+ {
+ if (debug_threads)
+ fprintf (stderr, "Set pc to %08lx.\n", (long) stop_pc);
+ (*the_low_target.set_pc) (stop_pc);
+ }
/* We consumed the pending SIGTRAP. */
event_child->pending_is_breakpoint = 0;
@@ -878,14 +886,14 @@ retry:
}
if (debug_threads
- && WIFSTOPPED (*wstatp))
+ && WIFSTOPPED (*wstatp)
+ && the_low_target.get_pc != NULL)
{
struct thread_info *saved_inferior = current_inferior;
+ CORE_ADDR stop_pc = (*the_low_target.get_pc) ();
current_inferior = (struct thread_info *)
find_inferior_id (&all_threads, child->head.id);
- /* For testing only; i386_stop_pc prints out a diagnostic. */
- if (the_low_target.get_pc != NULL)
- get_stop_pc ();
+ fprintf (stderr, "linux_wait_for_lwp: pc is %08lx\n", (long) stop_pc);
current_inferior = saved_inferior;
}
@@ -1644,8 +1652,8 @@ linux_resume_one_lwp (struct inferior_li
if (debug_threads && the_low_target.get_pc != NULL)
{
- fprintf (stderr, " ");
- (*the_low_target.get_pc) ();
+ CORE_ADDR pc = (*the_low_target.get_pc) ();
+ fprintf (stderr, " resuming from pc 0x%lx\n", (long) pc);
}
/* If we have pending signals, consume one unless we are trying to reinsert
Index: linux-x86-64-low.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gdbserver/linux-x86-64-low.c,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -p -r1.22 linux-x86-64-low.c
--- linux-x86-64-low.c 22 Mar 2009 23:57:10 -0000 1.22
+++ linux-x86-64-low.c 7 May 2009 03:03:09 -0000
@@ -128,8 +128,6 @@ struct regset_info target_regsets[] = {
static const unsigned char x86_64_breakpoint[] = { 0xCC };
#define x86_64_breakpoint_len 1
-extern int debug_threads;
-
static CORE_ADDR
x86_64_get_pc ()
{
@@ -137,16 +135,12 @@ x86_64_get_pc ()
collect_register_by_name ("rip", &pc);
- if (debug_threads)
- fprintf (stderr, "stop pc (before any decrement) is %08lx\n", pc);
return pc;
}
static void
x86_64_set_pc (CORE_ADDR newpc)
{
- if (debug_threads)
- fprintf (stderr, "set pc to %08lx\n", (long) newpc);
supply_register_by_name ("rip", &newpc);
}
Index: linux-i386-low.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gdbserver/linux-i386-low.c,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -p -r1.19 linux-i386-low.c
--- linux-i386-low.c 22 Mar 2009 23:57:10 -0000 1.19
+++ linux-i386-low.c 7 May 2009 03:03:09 -0000
@@ -154,8 +154,6 @@ struct regset_info target_regsets[] = {
static const unsigned char i386_breakpoint[] = { 0xCC };
#define i386_breakpoint_len 1
-extern int debug_threads;
-
static CORE_ADDR
i386_get_pc ()
{
@@ -163,16 +161,12 @@ i386_get_pc ()
collect_register_by_name ("eip", &pc);
- if (debug_threads)
- fprintf (stderr, "stop pc (before any decrement) is %08lx\n", pc);
return pc;
}
static void
i386_set_pc (CORE_ADDR newpc)
{
- if (debug_threads)
- fprintf (stderr, "set pc to %08lx\n", (long) newpc);
supply_register_by_name ("eip", &newpc);
}
next reply other threads:[~2009-05-07 3:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-07 3:11 Doug Evans [this message]
2009-05-24 0:26 ` Doug Evans
2009-05-24 16:47 ` Pedro Alves
2009-05-24 17:35 ` Doug Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090507031109.0CBFB84890@localhost \
--to=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox