From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32060 invoked by alias); 6 May 2009 18:37:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 32045 invoked by uid 22791); 6 May 2009 18:37:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 May 2009 18:37:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0662F2BACA5; Wed, 6 May 2009 14:37:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id juk56+xWsU8u; Wed, 6 May 2009 14:37:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37092BAB74; Wed, 6 May 2009 14:37:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 71847F5900; Wed, 6 May 2009 11:36:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 18:37:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ARI] Add "bzero" (was: "Re: Build failure for x86_64-pc-mingw32 target") Message-ID: <20090506183658.GR10734@adacore.com> References: <200904301028.29435.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200905061038.11004.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20090506160250.GJ10734@adacore.com> <83ws8ucd9z.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83ws8ucd9z.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 > Do we already have bcopy there? If not, we should add that, too, I > think. Yes, I just double-checked, we do have a rule for bcopy :) -- Joel