Re: [RFC] Remove last occurences of target_{insert/remove}_watchpoint

Pedro Alves
2009-05-06T17:14:25Z

On Wednesday 06 May 2009 17:54:25, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > I've just ran this version through sparc solaris 8, and
> > it survived without regressions (although it looks like solaris test
> > results got much worse somewhere along these last weeks -- around
> > 1300 fails), and watchpoints still work. Joel, would you like to
> > take a look at this and/or ran it on mips-irix?
>
> I won't have much time in the next few weeks, unfortunately :-(.
> But I did run it through the testsuite. The results are really abysmal
> but no regression.

Okay, I'll check it in then.

> # of expected passes 8361
> # of unexpected failures 2114
> # of unexpected successes 4
> # of expected failures 33
> # of known failures 29
> # of unresolved testcases 33
> # of untested testcases 72
> # of unsupported tests 30

It seems most failures on solaris are related to a single problem, e.g.,

p/c fun()
$1 = 49 '<error reading variable>
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/call-sc.exp: p/c fun(); call call-sc-tc

>grep "error reading variable" gdb.log | wc -l
1312

Looks like things are *really* broken. That's around
as many failures as instances of that error:

# of expected passes 10933
# of unexpected failures 1337
# of expected failures 41
# of known failures 54
# of unresolved testcases 9
# of untested testcases 13
# of unsupported tests 67

Does this ring a bell? I'll look at this at some point,
but probably only a couple of weeks or more from now.

--
Pedro Alves